basicV.C-001
Why does agitated saline NOT opacify the LV/LA in a structurally normal heart?
→ The macrobubbles of agitated saline are too large to cross the pulmonary capillary bed — they are filtered out in the lungs and never reach the left heart.
basicV.C-002
How many cardiac cycles suggest an intracardiac vs intrapulmonary shunt on a bubble study?
→ Bubbles in the LA within ≤ 3 cardiac cycles of RA opacification suggest an intracardiac shunt (PFO/ASD). Bubbles appearing after 4+ beats suggest an intrapulmonary shunt (pulmonary AVM as in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia).
basicV.C-003
Name three FDA-approved ultrasound contrast agents for LV opacification.
→ Definity (perflutren lipid microspheres), Optison (perflutren protein-type A), Lumason / SonoVue (sulfur hexafluoride microspheres). All contain gas-stabilized microbubbles that can cross the pulmonary capillary bed.
basicV.C-004
When should LV contrast be used per ASE guidelines?
→ When ≥ 2 of 6 basal or mid LV segments cannot be adequately visualized on standard imaging. Also to detect apical thrombus, apical HCM, LV noncompaction, aneurysm/pseudoaneurysm, and to improve wall-motion assessment during stress.
basicV.C-005
What mechanical index (MI) is used for LV opacification vs myocardial perfusion imaging?
→ Low MI (0.1–0.3) preserves microbubbles for opacification. Higher MI (~1.0) can be used to transiently destroy microbubbles during flash-replenishment for myocardial perfusion imaging.
basicV.C-006
Why does Valsalva release increase sensitivity of a bubble study for PFO?
→ During the release (strain) phase, RA pressure transiently exceeds LA pressure, promoting right-to-left shunting across a small PFO that might not be evident at rest.
basicV.C-007
What is a contraindication to intravenous ultrasound contrast?
→ Known hypersensitivity to the agent. Historically pulmonary hypertension and unstable cardiopulmonary status were contraindications; current labeling is relaxed but caution is advised in these patients.